Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review

Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review

Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review

Blink-182 - Cheshire Cat (1995) Review

Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review

Date: 2/17/1995

Length: 41 Minutes 59 Seconds

Genre: Rock

Class:

“Start of something great”

Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review Hands down made a style to claim as the kings of punk rock

Summary of Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Album Review: 

  • Mainstream: 

B-

  • Class:
  • Specific Genre Rating:

  •  FTW? Music For The World?: No, but [NON-EXPLICIT Lyrics].

+S (FTW: For The World, No EXPLICIT LYRICS)

-S (FTW: For The World BUT, HAS EXPLICIT LYRICS),

A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-

D+ (Bad but had potential), D, D-, (Could have flow etc just no concepts etc)

F+, (Completely bad, but artist could approve. Rather resample or take bits.)

F (SKIPPABLE)

8/10           – 4o7Ent.com

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

In General Rating: Skate/Punk/Pop-Punk

WOW

Not personal thing, the album is that good…

Can’t think of anything negative or what they could have done better.

3/5 —  “the group is rather scattershot here, hitting the target as often as they miss it”, i can agree, still pro-founding to a start of what they will become. 



* Over All Message: Love can be a trip.

* Key Songs: Wasting time, Carousel.

* Why is it Worth Listening to? Its a start of a band that had their sound from the very beginning, true artist/talent.

* Bad Songs: Not totally bad just least: Depends, Strings,

YES, its great to hear sum real rock garage.


No hype, no paid promo, this album was an experience to truly see how they came to be.

Blink-182 – Cheshire Cat (1995) Review Explained

  • Each song is unique, and amazing!
  • rarely find an album that has every track very familiar and have their sound down pack.
  • Sum skits were too much, eh.

Editor’s Choice — Genre — ★★★★: Once again, the genre punk is going to them. Only a matter of time before they blew up, even if it wasn’t this album.

  • Promo: 100% · Production Design 89.9% · Fan love 100%

Production — : There were no music videos due to this being their very first album.

  • Music Video –% · Direction –% · Editing –%

Lyrics — ★★★.8: The lyrics are not the greatest in the world, but i find them perfect for this genre, reason why i still gave it a decent score.

  • Poetry 69% · Vocals 100% · Tone 100% Flow/Melody 100%

Sound Design — ★★★★★: Drums: Amazing patterns. Sound Effects: Didn’t use much, just pure talent, but over all everything was fascinating.

  • Voice to Drums Mix Ratio 95.9% · Original Composer 99.9% · Voice to drums 98% – Still carried out perfect. Tom DeLonges voice made it better and fitting for this genre.

Mixing — ★★★★★: The Guitar:

Mastering — ★★★★: Can’t question the mixing and the mastering, i couldn’t point out any flaws. Rugged, Garage, yeah.

Beat/Instrumental — ★★★★★: The live instruments really shows how talented Travis Barker is.

Music Review Page

”Resource Reference:”

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  

Writer: Mr Reviews

Mr. Reviews built his reputation on pride and being a selective critic. His perfectionist outlook allows him to judge music by all their attributes, from audio mixing to beat selection. Mr. Reviews is confident that if he approves, you will too—even if you’re a picky listener.

Buy Fan-Art

Products by Brand

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x